SHELTER 3 PART1 MANUAL
Even worse, Bergen County Animal Shelter fails to explain in its Standard Operating Procedures manual how its definition of “unadoptable” (i.e.”unhealthy-untreatable” per the Asilomar Accords) is consistent with Asilomar Accords requirement that the shelter provide care that a “reasonable and caring pet owner/guardian in the community” would give to the animal. In addition, Bergen County Animal Shelter is not listed as a participating organization on the Shelter Animals Count web site (current version of the Asilomar Accords data reporting standards). Bergen County Animal Shelter does not publicly share its “Animal Statistics Table” on its web site as required by the Asilomar Accords. “we don’t euthanize healthy and treatable animals”).īergen County Animal Shelter fails to comply with the Asilomar Accords despite the county’s elected leaders claims. For example, many poorly run facilities classify large numbers of animals as “untreatable” and then claim they are no kill (i.e. The Asilomar Accords statistics often have been exploited by regressive shelters. Shelters calculate an Asilomar Accords Live Release Rate excluding animals euthanized by request of their owners and classified as “untreatable” and dogs and cats who died or went missing. Shelters must share these statistics with the public by posting on their web site, in newsletters, etc. Animals are considered “treatable” if a “reasonable and caring pet owner/guardian in the community would provide the treatment necessary to make the animal healthy” or “maintain a satisfactory quality of life.” However, animals that “pose a significant risk to human health or safety or to the health or safety of other animals” are not “treatable” per the Asilomar Accords. Animal shelters must report the numbers of impounded animals each year and the specific outcomes in an “Animal Statistics Table.” Euthanized animals are broken down into “healthy”, “treatable” and “unhealthy-untreatable” categories. The Asilomar Accords require members to compile specific animal shelter statistics and report this data to the public each year. Additionally, the Asilomar Accords encouraged members to not use terms such as “no kill’ as it was “divisive.” However, the Asilomar Accords required members to not criticize each other, even if such criticism was warranted. In general, the Asilomar Accords did not require shelters to adopt any lifesaving programs. In 2004, the regressive shelter establishment, Maddie’s Fund and certain limited admission shelters created the Asilomar Accords to allegedly save more animals in shelters. The Asilomar Accords were a deeply flawed agreement.
Is Bergen County Animal Shelter a no kill shelter? Is Bergen County Animal Shelter one of the best public animal shelters in New Jersey and arguably in the Northeast? Should Bergen County Animal Shelter’s Director receive an award for animal compassion?Īsilomar Accords Do Not Equal a No Kill Shelter Yankow’s achievements in “The field of Animal Compassion.” Joan Voss, gave Bergen County Animal Shelter Director, Deborah Yankow, a “Women of Distinction” award in 2016 for Ms. Bergen County’s Animal Shelter is not only one of the best public animal shelters in the state, but arguably one of the best in the Northeast.įurthermore, Bergen County Freeholder, Dr. Tedesco went on to state the following:Īs an animal lover, I believe formalizing this designation gives the residents of our county a better understanding of the shelter’s mission and helps us highlight what a great organization this is. In 2015, Bergen County Executive, James Tedesco, and the Bergen County Board of Chosen Freeholders announced the approval of a resolution recognizing Bergen County Animal Shelter as a “no kill shelter by adopting the Asilomar Accords.” Mr.
0 kommentar(er)
